Issue No : Aug      Dated :- 31 Aug  2010  

 21, Ramdan  1431 AH

| Home | Editorial |  English Edition | Urdu Edition | Photo Gallery | Advertise With US  | Feedback | Contact |

Home
Current NEWS Kashmir
Current NEWS Vienna
International NEWS
Kashmir Solution
Advertise With US
Our Profile
Photo Gallery
Sports
Important Links
Back Issues
Feedback Form
Contact

Embassy
of
Pakistan

************************

Kashmir  PORTAL
@
MyKashmir

************************

Visit Kashmir
With
Kashmir Travels

Austria Prayer Times

 

************************

Kashmir InFocus
(Monthly eMagazine
From Kashmir)

Current NEWS (Kashmir)

Analysing Kashmir: who failed, where?

It is indeed amazing that respected leaders are still apparently unaware of how to tackle the Kashmir-crisis. Even now, when they are giving the impression of considering a humanitarian approach towards it, it is difficult to take the apparent turn in their attitude seriously for it may be a part of their strategy to cleanse their image for the global audience. They have no choice but to indulge in such rhetoric. The world is not oblivious of what is going on in Kashmir. Statistics of number of innocent civilians having died due to firing from state-controlled bullets together with photographs of unarmed, young and angry people throwing stones are sufficient for the world to see. Why have these people been targeted by bullets? They could be checked, pushed back by use of tear gas, water cannons and other such means.

The governments, central led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and state by Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, seemed practically unfazed by loss of lives till it apparently dawned on them that they could no longer remain mute spectators to the Kashmir crisis. Sadly, they are still in the stage of deliberating on what moves should be taken to “win over hearts and minds of Kashmiris”. It simply points that they had given minimal importance to this aspect till date. They have probably started talking now only to improve their image and present a better picture to the world about their policy towards Kashmir and Kashmiris.

It is indeed ironical, that the same people who risked their lives, ignoring the fear of falling victim to militants’ bullets, to exercise their right to vote, are now being targeted by state-controlled bullets. Considering that it has not been an easy road for Indian Kashmiris as well as the Indian government to have reached this stage, it is indeed tragic that the governments have failed to pay the timely needed importance to Kashmir-crisis. Had the correct approach being timely used, the crisis would not have probably reached this stage.

During the July 7 meeting of Cabinet Committee on Security, the government opted for a “maximum crackdown” policy against Kashmiri protestors. During the second meeting (August 1), the CCS decided to send more forces to the state. At the same time, the government decided to initiate dialogue with Kashmiri leaders and focus on a political rather than a military solution to the problem. This was followed by Omar visiting a hospital in Srinagar to meet a few victims and their relatives. Subsequently, Home Minister P. Chidambaram responded to clarifications sought in Rajya Sabha on Kashmir-crisis by saying that “it is important to win the hearts and minds of people of Jammu and Kashmir.” Omar’s visit to the hospital apparently suggested the attempts being made by him in this direction. The media-coverage accorded to his visit certainly indicates that Omar did not want this move to go unnoticed. His aim is to improve his image, damaged considerably, having failed to control the Kashmir-crisis.

Willingly or unwillingly, Chidambaram’s statement exposes the harsh reality that Indian Kashmiris have been subject to. Kashmir-issue has certainly dominated strategic concerns of the government but in the process lives and problems of Kashmiris have not just been sidelined but also considerably exploited as well as abused. The latter point is supported by the callous manner in which young, unarmed Kashmiris have been killed for simply protesting against their fellow beings having been shot dead by state-controlled bullets.

The concerned authorities apparently thought that guns would silence Kashmiris and check others from protesting. They weren’t probably prepared for the frenzy with which Kashmiris would increase their protest caring little for loss of further lives. The Kashmiris have made a point. They have a right to protest and so they will irrespective of whether a few more among them fall victim to firing. It cannot be forgotten, as mentioned earlier, that Kashmiris have exercised their right to vote also without fearing, of being gunned down by militants.

But as Chidambaram’s comments suggest, till now, the Indian government had not given much importance to initiate steps to “win the hearts and minds” of Kashmiris. It is hoped that this statement of Chidambaram and Omar’s visit to hospital is followed by some constructive measures having some relevance for Kashmiris. So far, the “crackdown” approach has only alienated and agitated the Kashmiris further. Bullets can never win them over and/or silence them. The government has accepted the failure of this approach. But this isn’t enough. A crackdown approach is needed against those who have killed unarmed Kashmiris. They must be punished. Besides, relatives of those killed should be given some compensation, even if they don’t demand these!


Why is conscientious Indian civil society silent?

Over killings in Kashmir!

 Civil societies world over have listened to the voice of their conscience and saved humanity from bloodbath. They have risen against the tyranny and oppression perpetrated by cruel and oppressive rulers. The father of Indian nation, Gandhi ji waged struggle against oppression irrespective of religion, caste and ethnicity. It was struggle against oppression let loose against human beings. He came to be known as the founding father of the philosophy of no-violence.  Indian rulers have always exploited the slogan that “Bharat follows the principles of Gandhi ji.”

 

Unfortunately the Indian rulers have taken to the game of propaganda. They have rubbed Gandhi ji’s principles into dust at each step. He had clearly said:

 

“ Kashmiris will have to be given their rights according to their wishes. If it means shrinking of India in terms of territory, let it be; if her soul is pure and just, India can become the cradle of non-violence. If India cannot keep the Kashmiri people satisfied, then her image will be distorted in the eyes of world community.” (Atesh-e-Chinar)

 

Unfortunately, very small voices are raised against the treatment meted out by Indian rulers and their local agents to the people of Kashmir. We the people of Kashmir are at a loss why conscientious people of India are silent over the atrocities perpetrated on us. Is it India’s fake nationalism that prevents conscientious people from opening their mouth? Is it because of faith? Conscientious Indian civil society generally raises its voice against oppression anywhere in the world but not in Kashmir. Why is it so? Why is India bent on distorting her image in the eyes of the whole world?

 

Is it because Kashmiri men, women and children have not guns in their hands? All that they have is one and only one slogan “What do we want? Freedom (azaadi)”. For raising this slogan, Indian security forces and police rain bullets on them. In no civilized country of the world bullets are rained on peaceful protesting mass rallies.  Usually, mass rallies are peaceful but security forces baton charge them at every turn. They instigate the crowds to violence. Youth pick up stones in self-defence, in retaliation of which security forces shoot them in their heads and chests. It seems there is deliberate attempt to kill Kashmiri children and youth.

 

Mass protests are not exclusive to India. These take place from time to time in many countries. Security forces generally use water canons and tear gas shells to disperse mobs. But here bullets are rained even on womenfolk. Security forces come out on rampage almost every day shattering window and motor vehicle panes. Now people have begun covering the windowpanes with metallic sheets for protection.

 

Indian security forces have come down far below the level of humanism. They baton charge the passers by. They are also using catapults to shoot pebbles on the windowpanes of private houses and break the glasses. “It is rumoured that in 2008 some officers of CRPF had given the contract of breaking the windowpanes of cars to manufacturer making glass.” According to an estimate the security forces are reported to have broken the screens of nearly ten thousand cars so far. They, too, have broken windowpanes of nearly twenty thousand private houses. Our youth also help the Indian manufacturers of glass by smashing windowpanes as all screens and spare parts needed to fix a damaged vehicle are imported from outside the state.

 

Parents of youngsters complain that the police pick up teen aged boys of 12 to 13 years of age and put them under custody in police stations and then demand their parents to pay them a bribe of anything between 15 and 30 thousand rupees to set their wards free. Scarves of women are removed in public. What more proofs than these are needed about a dehumanised segment of society?

 

The rulers in Kashmir call themselves Kashmiris but a deeper insight will reveal a horrendous story. They are foremost in perpetrating oppression on people. People would want to know why no fewer than 80 persons have been killed since this February, most of them innocent and young children both males and females. Now things have come to a pass that Pellet Guns used for shooting at animals are used to fire at human beings.

 

We put a question to those who consider Gandhi ji as the model of humanism. We ask them if they think that Kashmir is a hunting ground and its people are the hunted ones? Can the sentiment of freedom be suppressed by throwing the youth and children into prisons? If this sentiment could not be suppressed for last 63 years then how can you do it now? Omar Abdullah and his father both should understand that whatever they have got or achieved has been achieved only on the behest of this nation. This does not mean that they should subject the entire nation to violence and oppression and thus secure their seats of power.  Many chief ministers have had heir day in the past, and Dr. Farooq Abdullah gives statements that give an impression as if in his infatuation for the seat of power he has become a member of Shiv Sena.

 

We record here some instances showing the circumstances in which a couple of Kashmiri youth were done to death. The purpose is to open the eyes of the people in India that how a claimant to democracy spills the blood of innocent youth.

 

1.    Zahid Farooq aged 17 was the only brother of three sisters. On Feb 5, 2010. He was playing cricket with his friends on the roadside, which the BSF Commandant objected to and sent them away.. As they were going back they were fired upon from behind and Farooq was martyred while not a stone was pelted nor was there any rally brought out.

2.    Inyatullah was returning from tuition and was fired upon around Lal Chowk. His dead body was mauled under a CRPF truck. He was just 14 years old. This happened on 14 Jan 2010.

3.    Wamiq Farooq, 17 years, as returning from the house of a relative. A tear gas shell hit him on his head and killed him.

4.    On 11 June, Tufail Ahmad Mattoo, 17 yeas old, the only brother of three sisters was returning from tuition. His head was targeted for tear gas shell. His brain got splashed on the road. What must have passed on the parents of this martyred boy, can the defamers of the name of Gandhi ji imagine? I could not muster courage to go to meet the bereaved family and condole the death. What was I to say? Is there any bigger tragedy than a father carrying the coffin of his young son on his shoulders?

5.    Javed Ahmad Malla 17 years     

6.    Shakeel Ahmad Ganai 17years, killed in Sopor

7.    Ferdous Amad 18 years, Sopor

8.    Bilal Ahmad Wani 18 years, Sopor

9.    Asif Ahmad Rathor, 9 year child, received CRPF gunshot. Nine year old child could not be a terrorist?

10. Tajammul Bashir Bhat 20 year youth shot dead

11. Ishtiaq Ahmad Khanday 15 years

12. Imtiaz Ahmad 18 yeas

13. Shujat ul Islam 19 years. All three were shot dead by police after barging into their homes in Anantnag.

14. Muzaffar Ahmad Bhat 17 years, Srinagar. Custodial death, dead body was found on the roadside after three days of his arrest.

15. Fayaz Ahmad Wani, 24 years, was among the funeral procession people who were fired upon and he was martyred. It means that after killing a person there is not the permission to lift the coffin.

16. Fancy Jan 25, was standing behind the window of her house and looking out and for this crime she was shot dead. Why Ravan like treatment by worshippers of Sita with the Kashmiri women?

17. Abrar Ahmad Khan 18 years. Shot at while in peace procession.

18. Faizan Rafiq 13 year kid. Task Force gave him a hot purchase. He jumped into the river and was drowned. His killers allowed him to get drowned so as to save one bullet to kill another person.

19. Showkat Ahmad Chowpan 20 years was shot and killed by CRPF firing while he participated in peace march.

20. Muhammad Rafiq Bhat 14 years killed in firing in Pattan. Reason being in peace march.

21. Mudasir Ahmad Lone, 17 years old in Bandipora.

22. Rais Ahmad Wani 18 years killed in Pampore.

23. Navin Ahmad Shah, 20 years old youth. Victim of CRPF bullet in Haiderpora.

24. Afrozah Teli, 17 years old girl martyred in Khrew.

25. Tariq Ahmad Dar 17 years martyred in Bejbehara.

26. Tariq Ahmad Sheikh, 17 years. Picked up by CRPF and brutally tortured and died in hospital.

27. Ashiq Hussain Bhat 14 years killed in CRPF firing on peaceful march in Kulgam.

28. Muhammad Yaqub Bhat, 18 years shot at and killed in Pulwama.

29. Arshad Ahmad, 17 years, tortured and shot at in Sangham

30. SamirAhmad Rah, 9 years old child in Batamloo was crossing the road in front of his house. CRPF struck him with batons and sticks. He was neither in any rally nor threw any stone. What has Indian democracy to say of this inhuman act of murder?

31. Anis Ahmad, 17 years resident of Narvor. Participated in anti -firing peace rally. His dead body was dragged and CRPF placed R.C. Pipe on the dead body.

32. Fida Nabi Lone, 20 years was shot dead by CRPF

33. Farrukh Bukhari 19 years from Baramulla, killed in police custody and the dead body thrown into the river.

34. Mudasir Ahmad Zargar 17 years was shot at when coming out of the mosque after prayers in Kupwara.

35. Arif Mir, 18 years shot and killed by CRPF in Sopor.

36. Omar Ahmad Dar 16 years shot and killed by CRPF in Narbal, Srinagar.

37. Millat Ahmad Dar, 8 years old shot and killed by CRPF in Anantnag. His fault was that he was a Kashmiri kid. Though Indian rulers and National Conference have announced war against Kashmiris but civilized nations do not kill children in war.

38. On August 19, CRPF came out on a rampage in Soura and started breaking windowpanes of private houses. In one house they fired at parents and a teen-aged girl child and its aunty. Teen-aged kid was killed under stick blows. Four of the victims are fighting for life in the hospital. The teenaged girl was shot in her chest.

 

I have listed only 38 cases out of the people killed so far. These killings took place since February. All of them fall in the age group of 9 – 20. The total number of killed computes to nearly 80. Kashmiris put a question to the conscientious Indian civil society. Which country’s law allows firing on peaceful rallies of people? In which country’s law book are we told to rain bullets and kill those who pelt stones? Since February,  80 people have been killed and more than 800 young persons, males, females and children are fighting for life in hospital with wounds. How many of them will become disabled loosing a leg or an eye. More than a thousand people have been sacrificed at the altar of India democracy.

 

During “Bharat band, Shiv Sena and BJP destroyed property worth 64 thousand crore rupees in Mumbai alone. They humiliated the police in public but not a single casualty happened as a result of police firing. Demonstrations take place in many cities and towns of India. There is pillage and destruction by miscreants. Stones are pelted on police. But unlike Kashmir nowhere in these demonstrations are bullets rained.

 

Naxalites can kill 70 or 80 CRPF jawans at a time but still the Indian people call them their own people and do not ask for military operation against them. Against it in Kashmir fire is opened on peaceful demonstrations and kids of 8 or 9 years are made the target. Kashmiris are forced to think that India has decaled war against them?. India should remember that even a strong and big nation has not been able to suppress a smaller one. Viet Nam, Algeria and Afghanistan are the examples before us.

 

A few days ago some unknown person sent some threatening letters to Kashmiri Sikh community. There was the talk of threatening to the Sikhs. Kashmiri Sikh community has been living in harmony with the Muslim community for many centuries in the past. People says “It is a conspiracy by the rulers and miscreants to communalise Kashmir’s peaceful struggle for freedom.” Four and a half lakh Indians came to Kashmir on Amarnth pilgrimage to visit the lingam at the holy cave. Sixty thousand Kashmiri Pandits participated in Khir Bhavani festival in Tulamula. The function continued for three days and the Kashmiris demonstrated their hospitality in full and invited them to their homes. If a Kashmiri Pandit dies in the valley, his Muslim friends take care of his cremation. Therefore the Indians should try to understand that the state rulers want to convert the freedom struggle of Kashmiris into communal clash with the sole motive of saving their seats of power.

 

Let me make an appeal to the people of India. Do not become silent spectators of humanity in destruction. If you are not willing to rise in support of Kashmiris, at least rise to uphold the principles and ideals of Gandhi Ji and the honour of India by saving Kashmiris from being butchered. Raining bullets on unarmed people will bring a lasting blot on India and the ideals of Gandhi ji.

 

   Hashim Qureshi

Chairman JK Democratic Liberation Party

                                    
I.S.I. defies orders of Rahman Malik, punishes Kashmiri family inspite of Bizenjo help.
 

BERN, Switzerland: Pakistan's infamous Inter Services Intelligence that has been accused of running a parallel government in the South Asian country, is now openly flouting the orders of the country's interior minister.

The Hong Kong-based Asian Human Rights Commission (A.H.R.C.) has received information that the Pakistan Embassy in Berne has allegedly refused the renewal of passports to a Pakistani family on the instructions of I.S.I. in spite of written instructions from Interior Minister Rahman Malik.

One official from the embassy privately told the family that intelligence agencies have objections on granting the renewal of passports to Sardar Shaukat Kashmir, who believes in the independence and sovereignty of Jammu and Kashmir, and wants both Islamabad and New Delhi to keep their hands off of Kashmir.

The orders from Rahman Malik to the passport authorities was flouted on the bidding of Hassan Habib, first secretary of the Pakistan Embassy in Berne, Switzerland. Habib is suspected of being an I.S.I. spook.

Since Pakistan is a rogue state, her embassy officials confiscated the passports of Kashmiri's family after taking 474 Swiss francs from them as fees for renewal of the passports.

Kashmiri, who now lives in exile in Switzerland, is the chairman of United Kashmir Peoples National Party, which advocates an independent Kashmir.

Senator Mir Hasil Bizenjo, a friend of Kashmiri since early 1980s when the two were leaders of the United Students Movement at the University of Karachi, requested Rahman Malik for renewing the passports of the Kashmiri family. In turn, Rahman Malik on June 27 directed the director general of immigration and passport to renew their passports.

Kashmiri's mother-in-law is frail and sick and his spouse and kids had wanted to go visit her in Poonch.

Pakistan passport officials sent a letter to embassy of Pakistan at Bern on July 1, requesting it to renew the passports. Following that, Hassan Habib, the first secretary at the embassy, asked the applicants to submit the fee for renewal of passports. The fees for passports were paid on 5 July 2010..

During this time the applicants were told that clearance from Islamabad has not reached Bern. An embassy staffer informed the family the intelligence agencies are reluctant to give clearance for the renewal of passports because of Kashmiri's activism for independence of his homeland.

Senator Bizenjo, who Baloch nationalists allege has strong links within the I.S.I., has now told Kashmiri the dreaded agency was not granting a clearance for renewal of his family's passports.

Kashmiri was arrested by the I.S.I., first in 1992 and a second time in 1998, and was kept incommunicado in military torture cells for many months. He was severely tortured and forced to denounce the independence of Kashmir. He was offered by the I.S.I. to work for the agency at international level, but he fled from Pakistan in 1999.

Many Kashmiris prefer to work for the I.S.I. because they are said to be paying better rates than R.A.W. Switching loyalties from one side to another is not uncommon among some Kashmiris, while others play both sides, insiders say.

However, Shaukat Kashmiri is a committed secular and progressive political activist.

Few years ago, I.S.I. operatives working at the Pakistan embassy in Switzerland created rowdy scenes when Kashmiri went to the Geneva Press Club to address a Press conference, the club officials told this reporter. The I.S.I. accuses him of working for its arch rival R.A.W. (Research and Analysis Wing) of India.

Interior minister Malik, who allegedly made millions of dollars in the Iraqi food-for-oil scheme, was handpicked by President Asif Ali Zardari to head the interior ministry. Malik was once a very low official in the Federal Investigation Agency, but climbed the slippery pole of promotions allegedly through alleged bribes, manipulations and sleaze, Pakistani media reports say.

Independence Day & flood havoc

As the monsoon rains have brought widespread havoc in all parts of the country, the Independence Day of Pakistan on Aug 14 went without any funfair. Anyway, Gilgit-Baltistan is still long way away from the blessing of freedom as the United Nations is not taking any interest in fulfilling its pledge of holding a plebiscite to decide the future of the region in accordance with wishes of its inhabitants. To add to this, the region has been devastated by the natural calamity of unimaginable magnitude paralyzing the already haggard infrastructure.According to the chief minister Syed Mehdi Shah, about 195 villages consisting of 2,627 houses have completely destroyed while 122 people lost their lives in the deluges. Standing crops of wheat, maize and potato over about 72,000 kanals were washed away.The world famous and vital 622-km-long Karakoram Highway linking Pakistan and China has almost lost its existence due to the floods. The floods also washed away about 340 water channels and damaged 63 bridges in the region. As a result, about 86,000 people have been affected by the natural calamity.
The chief minister has also acknowledged that after Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Gilgit-Baltsiatn was the worst affected region. As a result, the area has plunged about 30 years back in terms of development. The chief minister has demanded Rs10 billion for rehabilitation which may take at least five months to complete.Though the chief minister is making hue and cry over the destructions, his government is seen nowhere in rescuing or helping the affected people though political statements are coming out ferociously. On the other hand, the Balawaristan National Front (BNF) has issued a fact sheet according to which the villages of Qamrah, Talas, Giyes of Diamar, Hotoo, Rondu, Darel, Tangir, Botogah, Khinar, Thor, Hoodoor,Babusar, Gini, Hunza Nagir, Chhamoogardh Colony of Konodas and Skarkooi, Gilgit, Ghowadi Baltistan, Yasen, Gulaper, Isshqaman, Damas, Ginday, Sandhi, Hondoor, Dahrkoot, Mastuj, Booni, Garam Chashma, Yarkhoon in Chitral, and Koli and Pattan in Kohistan have suffered widespread destructions. It said over 1,300 people have been killed and about 200 are still missing in these areas.More than half a million have become homeless and nearly 50,000 families completely lost their belongings, including land, shelter, livestock and all means of living.
This is initial information which changes with the passage of each hour. Announcing one million rupees for the flood devastated people of GB, the BNF Chairman Abdul Hamid Khan asked the rulers if they can donate some funds from their billions of rupees bank balances for the poor people at this hour of need. Strangely, the chief minister instead of utilizing all government resources in aid of the displaced people is awaiting help from outside which, if comes, is also not likely to reach those in need. The world community has been not forthcoming in providing aid to the flood victims in Pakistan and Gilgit-Baltistan knowing widespread corruption among the officials.At the moment, the situation is such that this harshly hit region is not protected from the looting of Pakistani rulers and the latest example of this was seen during the construction of spillways at the artificial lake in Attabad where 350 million rupees were embezzled in the name of removing some soil. In such a situation, the international community is also perturbed on how to provide aid to the victims of the region by saving it from the corrupt officials.
Even no individual philanthropist or organization is ready to donate to the affected people through these corrupt officials, as they do not trust them. In these circumstances, the exiled ChairmanOf the Balawaristan National Front, Mr Abdul Hamid Khan has appealed to the international community to come out of the confusion and generously help the people in need. The people of Gilgit-Baltistan do not need cash and they should be directly provided relief items like medicines, food, clothing, besides equipment and material to be used in the reconstruction work. He also said that individuals known for their integrity and honesty in the region should be handed over the relief items so that they can distribute them among the affected people in a transparent manner.Another problem is that so far there are no correct figures of the destruction and the picture presented by the chief minister cannot be taken as the actual picture of the situation. According to an estimate, some one million people have directly or indirectly been affected by the floods while around 100 villages have lost their existence. Roads in the region have been destroyed while standing crops, orchard trees, water channels, pipelines, small hydropower stations and houses have also been washed away.In such a situation well-to-do people in the country as well as abroad are ready to wholeheartedly come to the help of the affected people but again there is the issue of credibility as those wishing to donate money think twice whether their money would reach the people in need.
This is yet another tragedy the dishonesty of the rulers is causing. Already the nation's wealth ahs been stashed in foreign banks by corrupt politicians while the masses are committing suicide due to poverty and hunger. And when there is a natural calamity like this, political leaders' corruption and dishonesty becomes a stumbling block in the way of foreign aid. At this moment, we also consider it need of the hour that a commission consisting of people with honesty and reputation should be formed to solicit and distribute aid among the displaced people so that the region is saved from the aftermath of the floods and the affected people rehabilitated. The day of independence this year went without any fanfare but the people now have to think twice what Pakistan gave them in hours of need. For the last 63 years, Pakistani rulers have been plundering the resources of Gilgit-Baltistan but whenever the local people face natural calamity, Islamabad never come to their rescue. It is need of the hour that the nation should open its eyes and realizes the fact that what would have been the destiny of the region had its people been free to run their affairs in accordance with their wishes and need. It is also hoped that the international community will not leave the people of Gilgit-Baltistan at the mercy of natural calamities.


Peaceful Protest held in New York against Indian atrocities in Kashmir
 

New York, August 15, 2010.  Kashmiri Americans held a peace rally in front of the Indian Mission to the United Nations in New York City to ask the world powers, “Should India Get Away With The Flouting of International Agreements?” and “Should India Be Granted a License For The Genocide of the People of Kashmir?”
 
The demonstration was reverberating with the slogans of “Kashmiris Demand Right to Life.” Protesters were carrying the placards demanding “Indian Army: Quit Kashmir”; “We Demand Self-determination”; “India Honor UN Pledges”; “Stop Killings in Kashmir”; “Stop State Terrorism in Kashmir”; “Kashmiris Demand Peace & Justice”.

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Executive Director, Kashmiri American council/Kashmiri Center  said that we demand that Indian Government stop the killings and agree to an impartial investigation into the recent killings, and into the human rights violations ongoing in Kashmir for the longest time. To resolve this outstanding dispute between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, the international community and the leadership of the people of Jammu & Kashmir must be involved for lasting peace in South Asia.

Dr. Fai reiterated that the people of Kashmir demand an end to the military occupation of their land by India; and they demand what they have been pledged by both India and Pakistan and guaranteed by the Security Council, with the unequivocal endorsement of the United States – demilitarization of Kashmir and a free vote organized impartially.

Fai reminded President Obama about his pledge that he gave to the whole world on September 25, 2008 that, “I will continue support of ongoing Indian Pakistani efforts to resolve Kashmir problem in order to address the political roots of the arms race between India and Pakistan.” Fai emphasized that the people of Kashmir demand that India act as a democratic nation and respect the rule of law. They also demand that Kashmir's right to self-determination be honored as an inalienable right.

Sardar Sawar Khan said that in the last two months over 60 people have been killed by the Indian armed forces in Kashmir in the massive riots that have taken place. This brutal murder of ordinary people must stop immediately. The armed forces have been silencing innocent Kashmiris from expressing their opposition to India's occupation of Kashmir. More than four hundred political activists and entire leadership including Mian Abdul Qayyum and Shabbir Shah have been imprisoned in contravention of Article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Hundreds have been detained or arrested including Naeem Ahmed Khan and Mohammad Yasin Malik. In such an atrocious atmosphere of trauma, horror and chaos, your government officials must not be delusional in vehemently declaring that everything is under control.

Hafiz Mohammad Sabir reminded that the Kashmir question is one of the oldest unresolved international problems in the world. The experience of nearly six decades has shown that it will not go away and that an effort is urgently required to resolve it on a durable basis.  ‘Durable’, in this context is synonymous with ‘equitable’.  It is imperative, whatever be the rights and wrongs in the equation as far as arguments go, real populations with a pronounced sense of identity of their own, with their suffering and their aspirations rather than just legal title and merit are involved.

Sardar Haleem Khan said that the real face of India is evident truly in Kashmir where the Indian Army during the past 20 years has killed over 100,000 men, women and children and tortured and maimed tens of thousands. Sardar Haleem Khan reminded President Obama what he said on October 30, 2008 that, “We should probably try to facilitate a better understanding between Pakistan and India and try to resolve the Kashmir crisis.”

Others who were present included Dr. P. Mir, Mr. Aftab Shah, Sardar Zahid Hussain, Sardar Imtiaz Ahmed, Chowdhry Mohammad Ishaq, Sardar Niamat Khan, Malik Nadeem Abid, Choudhary Mohammad Akram.

The following Diaspora political parties showed unflinching faith in their goal for freedom.

Kashmiri American Council; All J & K Muslim Conference; Jammu Kashmir Peoples Muslim League; Jammu Kashmir Peoples Party; Peoples Party Pakistan AJK; Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front; Kashmir Mission; Jamaat-e-Islami, Azad Kashmir;  and World Kashmir Freedom Movement.

Shoe-Throwing Policeman hailed as "hero" in Kashmir
SRINAGAR, India — A Muslim policeman who flung a shoe at Indian Kashmir's chief minister Omar Abdullah was hailed as a hero Monday, with thousands of people descending on his home village to congratulate his family.

Every major Indian newspaper ran front page photos of Abdul Ahad Jan's shoe sailing over Abdullah's head, as the minister spoke at an Indian independence day event Sunday in Kashmir's summer capital Srinagar.

The improvised missile failed to find its target and Jan, who had chanted "We want freedom" and waved a black flag -- a symbol of Kashmiri separatism -- was quickly overpowered by bodyguards.

The incident was captured live on television and prompted several thousand people to descend on Jan's home village of Ajas, about 40 kilometres (25 miles) north of Srinagar.

Witnesses said women showered flowers on Jan's wife, Bega Jan, and kissed and hugged her, while others beat drums outside her home and the crowd chanted "Long live Ahad Jan."

"What he has done is unbelievable. He has done us proud. It was the manifestation of the anger that every Kashmiri harbours," Merhaj-u-Din, a contractor and part of the crowd at Ajas, told AFP by telephone.

The celebrations, which had a distinctly anti-India complexion, began on Sunday and continued through the night and into Monday.

The last two months have witnessed the worst violence in the Muslim-majority Kashmir Valley in more than two years.

Stone-throwing protesters opposed to Indian rule have clashed with police on a near daily basis in Srinagar and other towns.

Nearly 60 protesters and bystanders have been killed, most of them young men or teenagers shot dead by police.

Chief minister Abdullah, who heads the National Conference, the main pro-India party in Kashmir, sought to laugh off the incident.

"Hurling a shoe is better than hurling a stone," he told the crowd at the independence day rally.

Abdullah has come under a lot of pressure for his handling of the recent unrest, with many Muslims blaming him for what they see as the disproportionate police response to the protests.

Jan remains in custody, and police officials were quick to issue a statement questioning his mental state.

"He is mentally unsound and is facing charges in a criminal case. He has already been suspended for his criminal activities," the statement said.

Jan's family rubbished the police version.

"He is mentally fit. But he was disturbed by the recent killings of civilians. He has always resisted injustice," said Azad Jan, his relative.

Jan's name was also on the lips of supporters in Srinagar.

"I salute his courage for throwing a shoe at a person responsible for killing over 50 people. Ahad Jan is our hero," said Abdul Majid, a shopkeeper.

"His picture should be on currency notes once we are free," he said.

Kashmri needs a political solution, Dr. Manmohan Singh

NEW DELHI: The following is the text of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's speech on Jammu and Kashmir:

"I welcome you today with grief in my heart, but hope in my mind.I grieve for all those who have lost their near and dear ones in Kashmir and in the Ladakh region.I propose that we rise to observe a minute’s silence to pray for the departed.

The Government of India will continue to provide relief and other assistance and help the State Government in providing rehabilitation for all those affected by the unfortunate natural disaster in Ladakh. The whole country is with the people of J&K in their hour of sorrow.

The events in Kashmir over the past few weeks have caused me great pain. I share the grief, the sorrow and the sense of loss of every mother, every father, every family and every child in Kashmir.

I can feel the pain and understand the anger and frustration that is bringing young people out on to the streets of Kashmir. Many of them have seen nothing but violence and conflict in their lives and have been scarred by suffering.
Today I wish to share with you my sense of hope for the people of Jammu and Kashmir that I have long nurtured.

The State is only now emerging from the shadow of more than two decades of a deadly insurgency, which brought only death and devastation to the beautiful State. These were two lost decades in the history of Jammu & Kashmir’s development.

Let us make a new beginning. I appeal to the youth to go back to their schools and colleges and allow classes to resume. I ask their parents: what future is there for Kashmir if your children are not educated?

I am convinced that the only way forward in Jammu and Kashmir is along the path of dialogue and reconciliation.

Our Government, more than any other government in the past, has invested heavily in the peace process in Kashmir. The brave rejection of militancy by the people opened the door for us to pursue an unprecedented and intensive internal and external dialogue on the issues that have bedeviled Jammu and Kashmir for six decades.

With Pakistan we took a number of bold and indeed historic decisions. A bus service was started. We facilitated trade across the LOC. We facilitated arrangements for divided families to meet. We changed the policy on allowing people representing different shades of opinion to visit Pakistan because we wanted to involve all sections of the people in the peace process.

We set up a number of round-tables and then working groups in which many of you participated actively. Recognising the diversity of the State, we tried to address the problems of the Kashmir valley, Jammu and Ladakh in a comprehensive manner. We committed unprecedented financial resources for the State’s economic reconstruction.

I repeat all this to remind you of the many positive things that have happened as a result of the peace process and the sincere efforts we have made to bring about a durable peace in Jammu & Kashmir.

Nothing will give me greater satisfaction than to see a permanent and just settlement of all outstanding issues that protects the honour and self-respect of all sections of the people of the State.

But even with the best of these intentions, I cannot say that a complex problem that has defied resolution for 63 years can be solved easily or quickly. We need patience, wisdom and a spirit of conciliation to guide us through ups and downs in the process.

I urge the people of Jammu and Kashmir to give peace a chance. There is a lot of hard work that needs to be done to rebuild the State and its institutions. We must promote economic activity and create opportunities for employment. We must build physical and human resource infrastructure.

But I recognize that the key to the problem is a political solution that addresses the alienation and emotional needs of the people. This can only be achieved through a sustained internal and external dialogue. We are ready for this. We are willing to discuss all issues within the bounds of our democratic processes and framework.

But this process can gather momentum and yield results only if there is a prolonged peace.

I believe that the vast majority of the people want a peaceful resolution of all issues. Let us recognize that repeated agitations whether violent or otherwise only obstruct this process.

The cycle of violence must now come to an end. We must collectively ensure that no innocent life is lost again. It is, of course, the bounden duty of the Government to maintain law and order. We cannot allow the turmoil to continue.

We understand the prevailing public sentiment on the issue of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Eventually the J&K Police has to take on the burden of normal law and order duties. They do not require special powers to discharge their functions. We will help to accelerate the process of strengthening and expanding the J&K Police so that they can function independently and effectively within the shortest possible time.

The J&K Police and other security forces are performing an extremely challenging task in difficult circumstances. Many of them have been seriously injured during the past few weeks.

There are elements that are trying to weaken the resolve of the J&K Police and trying to undermine their lawful efforts. I urge the State Government to take effective action to protect its policemen and their families. We should not do anything to demoralize the security forces.

The State Government and the Chief Minister are making efforts to renew contact with the people. The Central Government is fully supportive of these efforts, which should be intensified. I believe that all of you have the solemn duty of reaching out to the people and reinvigorating peaceful political activity on the ground, which is lacking today. The youth wings of your parties should be activated. In a democracy leaders have to listen to the voice of the people and gain their trust and confidence.

I believe that local body elections should be held early to increase peoples’ participation in democratic governance and to ensure political empowerment at the grassroots level.

I would urge you to build a consensus on a practical and realizable vision of Jammu and Kashmir’s future. And the people have to be convinced that this future has to be grounded in political and economic realities of our time.

Recently, young MPs from all political parties made an appeal to their brothers and sisters in J&K to exercise restraint and have trust in the power of dialogue. I fully endorse their call.

Every possible effort should be made to reach out to the youth in Jammu and Kashmir. We must respond in a sincere and substantive manner to their genuine aspirations for freedom from fear and for freedom to build for themselves a life of dignity, security and well- being.

I assure the youth of Jammu and Kashmir that their genuine empowerment will be accorded the highest priority in our Jammu and Kashmir policy.

I recognize that the benefits of the large economic reconstruction package for J&K have not been fully felt on the ground. We will quicken the pace of its implementation in cooperation with the State Government.

Based on the experience gained, I am proposing to set up an Expert Group headed by Dr. C. Rangarajan with Shri N.R. Narayana Murthy, Shri Tarun Das, Shri P. Nanda Kumar, Shri Shaqueel Qalander and an official representative of the J&K Government as members to formulate a Jobs Plan for the State, involving both the public and the private sectors. To increase employability in the State the Group will interact with the National Skill Development Mission and submit its report within three months.

But to show results of such efforts on the ground, you will have to engage actively with the youth and give them the sense of purpose, hope and direction they need to make use of the many opportunities that our economy provides.

I am optimistic about the future of Jammu and Kashmir. India’s democracy has shown that it has the resilience to accommodate a diversity of aspirations and unique circumstances and the capacity to solve complex problems.

If all sides show wisdom and restraint, I believe that we can put the bitterness and pain of the recent past behind us and breathe new life in to the peace process. I urge you to carry back with you a message of peace and reconciliation, a message of our serious will and intent to solve all problems through dialogue and a message of deep empathy for the youth of Jammu and Kashmir."

Joota Khapay – shoe rule

By Dr Shabir Choudhry    
After callous murder of former Prime Minister of Pakistan Banazir Bhutto, people of Pakistan in general, and people of Sindh in particular were extremely angry and  they raised certain voices which indicated break up of Pakistan. It was at that time Asif Zardari, husband of the deceased requested people to calm down and coined the phrase, ‘Pakistan Khapay’ – which in Sindhi means continuation of Pakistan.
However it is interesting that ‘Khappay’ in Punjabi and Urdu means annihilation or devastate. Asif Zardari also speaks these languages; and his critics question if he meant a Punjabi meaning or a Sindhi meaning when he said ‘Pakistan Khappay’.
That aside, leaders of Pakistan Peoples Party, and particularly Asif Zardari take pride in this slogan and from time to time chant it in their public rallies, especially at the end. However, luck was not on his side in Birmingham, England where huge amount of money was ‘invested’ to show public support for him and his heir apparent – Bilawal Zardari.
First impediment was the strong opposition to his trip to France and Britain when his country faced the worst floods in the history; and almost half the country was under water with more than 15 million people uprooted and more than 2000 deaths. The criticism was more sharp and effective because of extravagant expenses when every penny was needed to feed the uprooted people.
A
s a result of this strong criticism he had to make changes to the planned ‘launch’ his son, Bilwal in politics. And to add salt to wounds, a Kashmiri from Sensah, Kotli (Pakistani Occupied Kashmir) hurled two shoes at Asif Zardari to express his anger against his trip and his Kashmir policy. The shoes did not hit him but the insult and anger it generated was so overwhelming that Asif Zardari had to finish his speech abruptly and without the chant of ‘Pakistan Khapay’ and ‘PPP Khapay’.
This incident attracted so much interest in the media that both Asif Zardari and shoe thrower, Sardar Shameem Khan, immediately became part of history, although Asif Zardari is already very controversial and historic figure, but loathed and hated at the same time. After this incident he has become historic for abandoning his people in trouble and for being in a same league with the former President Bush.
‘The News’ correspondent came out with an interesting headline: ‘Zardari joins the Shoe Club with Bush’. What happened inside the hall was supported by hundreds of people protesting outside the hall against the visit. According to ‘The News’ report,Some demonstrators held up shoes to pictures of Zardari, while others held placards reading, “1000s dying, president is holidaying”, “Thousands killed, millions homeless, what president is laughing for?” and “Are the Zardaris enjoying England while Pakistan drowns?”

In line with the PPP tradition the party leaders have come out in force telling white lies and totally denying any knowledge of the incident of shoe throwing; although initially Qamar Zaman Qaira, Minister Information condemned the incident. He confirmed the incident took place. Hundreds of people which include dozens of journalists witnessed the incident; and yet PPP leaders have nerve to deny any knowledge of it. 

Later on the shoe thrower was located by Geo TV in Coventry where he lives, and his live interview was broadcasted late at night. This time the government behaved like a totalitarian government and stopped transmission of the Geo TV and ARY Digital; and despite this clear evidence the PPP leaders were brave enough to tell white lies and still continued with the denial of shoe throwing incident.

Because of the political culture in Pakistan, people try to find a conspiracy behind every incident. Many think the incident was managed by the Pakistani agencies; and fingers are being pointed to the elite agency of Pakistan. The purpose of this plot, according to the conspiracy theory, was to defame the President Asif Zaradri and destabilise his government, as if Asif Zardari is famous and his government is stable.

Some critics think opposition parties were behind this conspiracy and that is why Baber Awan, Minister of Law threatened that PPP workers also wear two shoes, implying that in future they will also target opposition politicians with shoes.

Some allege that Lord Nazir Ahmed, because of his close contacts with the Pakistani agencies, was behind this shoe throwing incident and the demonstration outside. In view of these people, Lord Nazir Ahmed has a clear anti Asif Zardari stance and close working relationship with the agencies and he managed all this while keeping himself out of this

However in my considered opinion all the above views are wrong. The demonstration was arranged by different political parties which included Kashmiri nationalist parties; and the shoe throwing incident was an act of one individual, although some believe that there was a meeting in Midlands one night before the rally in which this thing was discussed.

The man behind the incident, Sardar Shameem Khan is a friend of Mohammed Nazam Bhatti, President of Kashmir National Party in Britain. Nazam Bhatti confirms that there was no one behind Sardar Shameem Khan. Opposition parties, Pakistani agencies and Lord Nazir Ahmed have no role in this incident. Nazam Bhatti is the one who arranged all the interviews of Shameem Khan, including exclusive interview with Murtaza Shah, of the Geo TV.

Some people point out that this incident should not have taken place because it has brought shame to Pakistan as well; after all, Asif Zardari was an elected President of Pakistan. But one could argue that the target was not the President of Pakistan but Co Chairman of PPP, who holds two posts, despite clear conflict of interest.

The PPP leaders always take a similar position. Whenever Asif Zardari makes a blunder in his speech; and people protest that as a President he should be neutral and must not make a partisan speech, his followers claim this speech was delivered as a PPP Co Chairman.

Anyway, Nazam Bhatti says Shameem Khan belonged to the PPP, but he was angry with Asif Zardari and his government, because of what they have done to Pakistan and for their wrong Kashmir policy.

He cautioned Azad Kashmiri leaders to ‘stop shoe licking of Pakistani leaders’ and work in interest of Kashmiri people, else they will not be allowed to hold any public meetings in Britain in future.

Shameem Khan thinks people should not tolerate this corruption and looting by those who hold public office, and they must be held accountable for their actions. He says best way forward is that public should take off their shoes and discipline these leaders who have looted the public funds. He says like the slogan, ‘Pakistan khapay’ we should say ‘Joota Khapay’; and this campaign against these leaders must continue until they change themselves and become servants of the people in real sense.

He says, until this transformation takes place, people should not give them any funds because these funds will never reach where they are needed; and these leaders and corrupt officials will misappropriate these funds, as they did at the time of earthquake and will become millionaires.

Shameem Khan says, until such time people should give funds to those who are tried and trusted in the field of welfare and service to the needy. He said people should give funds to Kashmir Awami Foundation and Edhi Foundation.

JKNLC Gulpur (Kotli) Held its First Convention on 8th July, 10

Rawalpindi, August 09: Jammu Kashmir National Liberation Conference (JKNLC) Gulpur (Kotli) held its first, impressive and elaborate convention yesterday, which was presided by Mr. Javed Zafar, central V. President of JKNLC and a local leader and was conducted by Mr. Faisal Kashmiri, while Mr. Arif Shahid, President of JKNLC, was the chief guest. Since other nationalist parties were also invited, those who spoke, besides the chair and the chief guest, on the occasion were: Shaukat Maqbool Butt (addressed on telephone), Mr. Ramzan Datt, Advocate, Mir Siddique, Raja Abdul Qayyum, Mr. Azhar Kashar, Qayyum Ch., Tabarik Syed, Prof. MARK Khaleeque (JKNAP), Mr. Taifur (JKPNP) and some others.
The speakers congratulated the local leadership of JKNLC of Gulpur for putting such a hard work in political and ideological direction by arranging such a successful convention for the first time, especially with reference to nationalist camp, in Gulpur's history. They said that JKNLC believed in freedom of Jammu Kashmir to establish a democratic and secular state in it after its freedom, and was struggling for this purpose. They exposed and condemned Pakistan's govt. and its puppets in Pakistan-Administered-Jammu Kashmir (PAJK) and Occupied Gilgit-Baltistan (OGB) for their superficial, selfish and out-dated Kashmir policy through which she had converted these territories into her colonies. They said that JKNLC was serious and meant business to translate its ideals into reality, and would continue this struggle till achievement of the mission of free, democratic, secular and progressive Jammu Kashmir State.
Earlier, the local units of Gulpur Jammu Kashmir National Liberation Conference (JKNLC) and Jammu Kashmir National Students Conference (JKNLC) were also announced and given oath by the President of JKNLC, Mr. Arif Shahid, who congratulated them and expected sincerity, honesty, dedication and diligence of them for the cause of the party.
Before concluding, the book of Raja Abdul Qayyum (incharge diplomatic wing of JKNLC) – " Dastan-e-Azam" was launched and introduced by Raja Aftab, President of `Sultani Organization', which was based on the story of his imprisonment of 22 years in England on the allegation of murder of late Mr. Mahatre, a member of Indian diplomatic service, during Ist week of Feb, 84. The launching ceremony was hailed and welcomed by the participants of the convention.


Kashmir a helpless region, the story on other side of LOC:  By Javed Inayat


Pakistani side of Kashmir region has been facing enormous problems. Local state administration has not been functioning since it was set up after overthrowing ‘’ republic of Kashmir’’ in 1947 but since Oct, 2005 killer earthquake hit this region state administration was badly exposed. Apparently local govt. has been elected by voters but it authority is less than a municipal committee. POK state assembly is a legislative assembly but it has no jurisdiction to make a law or amend a law by itself. It is the only legislative assembly in the world which has been elected by local people but it has been controlled by unelected, non Kashmiri dignitaries , such as minister of Kashmir affairs, chairman Kashmir council, who happened to be Pakistani PM, chief secretary is one of the third top most administrators, who has more authority than POK PM. Ministry of Kashmir affairs is one of the Pakistani state federal ministries, its minister would be acting as a federal minister, who always have to be elected from Pakistan as a member of national assembly. Neither Kashmiris can elect him nor can replace him. He is the one who can be called a king maker in POK region including occupied Gilgit Baltistan. He makes and breaks the POK Govts. On behalf of state secret services including Army GOC Murree. One of them can decide who will run the show in POK and then circus can begin. POK region has been ruled by its interim constitution which popularly called act 1974. According this document, all powers lie in Islamabad, even Pakistani PM can dismiss POK PM or entire Govt. it depends on his mood and his background, if he is a military dictator, most probably he would like to dismiss whole POK Govt, and if he is a civilian he might stay only dismissing PM or president of POK. This shameful drama has been going on since 6 decades in POK region.

Last four years Islamabad had changed 4 PMs in POK region, only reason was federal minister may not liked one or the Pakistani PM or president may not liked one or the other POK PM. Two weeks ago third PM Raja Farooq Haider was ousted and fourth one sardar Attique khan was installed by Islamabad. Unfortunately, same Attique Khan was removed from power by his own party through no confidence motion against him, while charging him that he was involved in worst kind of corruption, mismanagement, misuse of state power, nepotism but shaming every citizen in POK last week, not only Muslim conference again given him PM mandate but more than 10 opposition MLAs also gave him vote. Pakistani state has reached on its suicide point but POK region has drown in to a lowest of the lower level of humanity by Pakistani official state politicians who have been involved in POK politics. Pok politicians have proved once again that they are not normal human beings let alone representatives of people. What these MLAs have done with this so called POK assembly no one can even think of doing that level cheapest politics and opportunism Attique Khan has shown this time again means crossed over all his father,s limits also. I do believe that POK people must be rethinking that a man who has been deceiving POK people half a century has produced a leader for POK people two steps ahead of him, who has no morals, no political norms, no vision and most importantly no shame at all doing this kind of so cheap politics with the help of corrupt Pakistani federal minister, state secret agencies and begging for shameful PM position. It was nice to see on media that Raja Farooq haider ousted PM of POK has been exposing his own party colleagues and assembly members Pakistani state role. Unfortunately, POK leaders always started talking about citizen rights when they got kicked out from power, humiliated and shown them their real position.

There have been very serious cracks appeared on the surface among POK ruling class sections this time. POK state has gone in to a very serious political economic and social crisis, so that Pakistani state is trying to down play this deep rooted crisis with changing PMs again and again to divert attention from real situation. POK region is going out of hand due to distance between artificial created ruling class by Pakistani state in POK and masses. Overwhelming majority of POK population thinks that they have no Govt. nor they feel comfortable with their politicians because they have been controlled by Pakistani state one way or the other. Most of them think that they have never been representative Govt in Muzaffrabad since Pakistani state had overthrown Republic of Kashmir on 24th Oct, 1947 nor their vote ever have been respected in terms of dismissing their elected Govts by Pakistani rulers. Now last 2 decades new generation has grown up in POK region and this generation has been observing its own conflicts with local colonial administration. Pakistani role has been exposed by local political groups, intellectuals, students organizations have been on the forefront of this new political development in the region. Since Pakistani state has launched a Jihadi project across the border, her role in Kashmir dispute has seen more doubtfully by POK youth because the country which has been demanding rights for those under Indian occupation but not granting the same rights to those Kashmiris who have been under her occupation. Valley based Jihadi movement has failed to radicalize POK youth even religious groups from POK having hard time facing POK youth. New political developments in POK region are more reasoning based, more relevant to local situation, more appealing to educated youth, most of them have no future living with Pakistani state, therefore, new political movement is emerging from POK region and it will be only POK centric. POK region has more than 70% education, highest than any Pakistani area this time but there is no industry, no professional institutions, no medical school, no business school, no job opportunities for POK youth. POK region has 4 million populations but 47 % has migrated since last 40 years due to lack of job opportunities in the region. After 2005 earthquake, economic situation has worsened due to Pakistani state official’s involvement in severe corruption and inability of local state administration. Now POK region has very serious economical conditions and state administration has become irrelevant. Local youth may not be able to continue peaceful political struggle if Pakistani federal ministers keep dismissing our PMs after 10 months. Pakistani involvement in POK affairs has been very counterproductive and it has damaged every level of trust among POK people.

BJP to hold 'Save Jammu & Kashmir Day' on August 21

BNO Desk:
Breaking News! Demanding the restoration of normalcy in J&K, the BJP party has announced that it will hold 'Save Jammu & Kashmir Day' across the country, on August 21. The party urged PM Dr. Manmohan Singh to intervene.
The party has decided to raise a voice against the law and order situations there and will observe August 21 as Jammu and Kashmir Bachao Diwas across the country.

On this day, the party is going to hold public meetings at the party headquarters in state capitals, and Central unit leaders will be attending the met.

The BJP General Secretary Ananth Kumar has alleged and criticized that under the Congress-ruled UPA government the state has moved from "separate status (under Article 370) to separatism”.

He has demanded not to decrease the Army and security forces in Jammu and Kashmir and also the government should take no steps to demoralize the security forces deployed in the state.

The matter was also debated in the Rajya Sabha, where the party said that the state is slipping out of control for which it has warned the government for its negligence of proper law and order in the state ,and if the government doesn’t take steps then this stage would further "dilute the sovereignty" of the region.


KASHMIR CRISIS

IF THE PRIME MINISTER DOES NOT TAKE BOLD STEPS TO ADDRESS THE GRIEVANCES OF THE KASHMIRIS, THERE'S NO TELLING WHERE THE NEXT ERUPTION WILL TAKE US, WRITES SIDDHARTH VARDARAJAN

WHATEVER his other failings, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah deserves praise for acknowledging that the protests which have rocked the Kashmir valley these past few weeks are ‘leaderless' and not the product of manipulation by some hidden individual or group.

This admission has been difficult for the authorities to make because its implications are unpleasant, perhaps even frightening. In security terms, the absence of a central nervous system means the expanding body of protest cannot be controlled by arresting individual leaders. And in political terms, the spectre of leaderless revolt makes the offer of ‘dialogue' or the naming of a ‘special envoy' for Kashmir — proposals which might have made sense last year or even last month — seem completely and utterly pointless today.

Ever since the current phase of disturbances began, intelligence officials have been wasting precious time convincing the leadership and public of India that the protests are solely or mostly the handiwork of agent provocateurs. So we have been told of the role of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and ISI, of the ‘daily wage of Rs. 200' — and even narcotics — being given to stone pelters. A few weeks back, an audio recording of a supposedly incriminating telephone call was leaked to the media along with a misleading transcript suggesting the Geelani faction of the Hurriyat was behind the upsurge. Now, our TV channels have “learned” from their “sources” that the protests will continue till President Obama's visit in November.

Central to this delusional narrative of manipulated protest is the idea that the disturbances are confined to just a few pockets in the valley. Last week, Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram told reporters the problem was limited to Srinagar and two other towns. No doubt, some areas like downtown Srinagar, Sopore and Baramulla were in the ‘vanguard' but one of the reasons the protests spread was popular frustration over the way in which the authenticity of mass sentiment was being dismissed by the government. For the women who came on to the streets with their pots and pans and even stones, or the youths who set up spontaneous blood donation camps to help those injured in the demonstrations, this attempt to strip their protest of both legitimacy and agency was yet another provocation.

In the face of this mass upsurge, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has two options. He can declare, like the party apparatchiks in Brecht's poem, that since the people have thrown away the confidence of the government, it is time for the government to dissolve the people and elect another. Or he can admit, without prevarication or equivocation, that his government has thrown away the confidence of the ordinary Kashmiri.

This was not the way things looked in January 2009, when Omar Abdullah became chief minister. Assembly elections had gone off well. And though turnout in Srinagar and other towns was low, there was goodwill for the young leader. Of course, those who knew the state well had warned the Centre not to treat the election as an end in itself. The ‘masla-e-Kashmir' remained on the table and the people wanted it resolved. Unfortunately, the Centre failed to recognise this.

It is too early to gauge the reaction to Mr. Abdullah's promise of a “political package” once normalcy is restored. But the people have thronged the streets are likely to ask why this package — which the chief minister himself admitted was “long in the pipeline” — was never delivered for all the months normalcy prevailed. What came in the way of amending the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act? Of ensuring there was zero tolerance for human rights violations? Of strengthening the “ongoing peace process both internally and externally”, as the all-party meeting in Srinagar earlier this month reminded the Centre to do?

At the heart of this missing package is the Centre's failure to craft a new security and political strategy for a situation where militancy no longer poses the threat it once did. The security forces in the valley continue to operate with an expansive mandate that is not commensurate with military necessity. Even if civilian deaths are less than before, the public's capacity to tolerate ‘collateral damage' when it is officially said that militancy has ended and normalcy has returned is also much less than before.

The immediate trigger for the current phase of protests was the death of 17-year-old Tufail Mattoo, who was killed by a tear gas canister which struck his head during a protest in Srinagar in June against the Machhil fake encounter of April 30. Many observers have blamed his death — and the deaths of other young men since then — on the security forces lacking the training and means for non-lethal crowd control. Tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannon are used all over the world in situations where protests turn violent but in India, live ammunition seems to be the first and only line of defence. Even tear gas canisters are so poorly designed here that they lead to fatalities.

Whatever the immediate cause, however, it is also safe to say that young Tufail died as a direct result of Machhil. Though the Army has arrested the soldiers responsible for the fake encounter, the only reason they had the nerve to commit such a heinous crime was because they were confident they would get away with it. And at the root of that confidence is Pathribal, the notorious fake encounter of 2000. The army officers involved in the kidnapping and murder of five Kashmiri civilians there continue to be at liberty despite being charge-sheeted by the CBI. The Ministry of Defence has refused to grant sanction for their prosecution and has taken the matter all the way to the Supreme Court in an effort to ensure its men do not face trial. What was the message that went out as a result?

Had the Centre made an example of the rotten apples that have spoiled the reputation of the Army instead of protecting them all these years, the Machhil encounter might never have happened. Tufail would not be dead and angry mobs would not be attacking police stations and government buildings.

Impunity for the few has directly endangered the lives of all policemen and paramilitary personnel stationed in Kashmir. There is a lesson in this, surely, for those who say punishing the guilty will lower the morale of the security forces.

Mr. Abdullah may not be the best administrator but his biggest handicap as chief minister has been the Centre's refusal to address the ordinary Kashmiri's concerns about the over-securitsation of the state. Today, when he is being forced to induct an even greater number of troops into the valley, the Chief Minister's ability to push for a political package built around demilitarisation is close to zero.

At the Centre's urging, Mr. Abdullah made a televised speech to his people. His words do not appear to have made any difference. Nor could they, when the crisis staring us in the face is of national and international proportions. Today, the burden of our past sins in Kashmir has come crashing down like hailstones. Precious time is being frittered in thinking of ways to turn the clock back. Sending in more forces to shoot more protesters, changing the chief minister, imposing Governor's Rule — all of these are part of the reliquary of failed statecraft. We are where we are because these policies never worked.

The Prime Minister can forget about the Commonwealth Games, AfPak and other issues. Kashmir is where his leadership is urgently required. The Indian state successfully overcame the challenge posed by terrorism and militancy. But a people in ferment cannot be dealt with the same way. Manmohan Singh must take bold steps to demonstrate his willingness to address the grievances of ordinary Kashmiris. He should not insult their sentiments by talking of economic packages, roundtable conferences and all-party talks.

He should unreservedly express regret for the deaths that have occurred these past few weeks. He should admit, in frankness and humility, the Indian state's failure to deliver justice all these years. And he should ask the people of Kashmir for a chance to make amends. There is still no guarantee the lava of public anger which is flowing will cool. But if he doesn't make an all-out effort to create some political space today, there is no telling where the next eruption in the valley will take us.

(COURTESY: THE HINDU)
(Siddharth Vardarajan is Associate Editor, The Hindu)

Offer on a gun barrel
Omar’s peace offer laced with arrogant self-righteousness lacks logic as well as credibility
Within less than a week’s time after the state government had appointed an inquiry commission to probe killing of seventeen persons in police firing since second week of June, nearly 30 more victims have been added to the gruesome list in less than a week’s time. A record indeed! Chief Minister Omar Abdullah could not have been more insensitive to underlying human tragedy than when he claimed ‘credit’ for managing to keep the number ‘below’ that recorded ‘under similar circumstances in 2008’ Amarnath land row agitation. When the innocent human beings felled by the bullets fired upon them by the ‘security’ forces of their own state are sought to be reduced to cold statistics for comparison it speaks volumes about the character of our rulers. Instead of hanging their heads in shame and accepting their moral responsibility for the carnage those responsible for it have the cheek to turn around and claim credit for what, by most charitable definition, can only be described as ‘merciful butchery’. This is most reprehensible. The coalition government’s record in this regard will remain forever stained with the blood of innocent citizens including children and women.
Omar Abdullah, while speaking in New Delhi after his meetings with the central government leaders on Monday, unfortunately failed to reflect the spirit of reconciliation even as he was labouring on his ‘commitment’ to initiate political measures after restoration of normalcy in the Kashmir Valley. He spoke the language of power and arrogance of power when he threatened his own people ‘there will be consequences’ if protestors did not behave or failed to remain peaceful. As if to clear any doubts on this score, the chief minister announced that he had sought additional forces from the centre and that contingents of Rapid Action Force (RAF) were on the way to Kashmir. Lauding the ‘maximum restraint’ being exercised by his ‘over-stretched security forces, Omar warned that restraint is not a one-way affair. On the face of it, Omar’s terminology is unexceptionable. Only that he forgot to remind himself of this norm when the trouble first broke out in the month of June with the killing of an innocent school boy whose life was snuffed out as he was returning from a coaching class. Thereafter it became a vicious cycle of violence. All that the chief minister was supposed to do at that crucial moment was to share the grief of the victim’s family which lost its only son and ordered a credible inquiry into the incident. The government’s failure to honour even this elemental part of its obligation led to a chain of gory events resulting in staggering bloodshed. Talking of the ‘restraint’ the CM could not be ignorant of a woman in Magharmal Bagh in Srinagar being shot dead right inside her house, a 9 year old boy being fired upon and then beaten up to his death at Aloochi Bagh or three boys being shot dead in the compound of a house at Anantnag. ‘Consequences’ are there for all to see. Omar is right in saying that there would be consequences of ignoring restraint. But he only sees one side of it and his government continues to be blind to seeing its other side. This type of pontification is devoid of logic and honesty. The situation could not have worsened to this extent if the CM had only remembered to practice what he is today preaching to others in retrospect.
The same arrogant refrain runs across the chief minister’s reiteration of the offer of ‘political package’ and ‘dialogue’ with alienated segments of public opinion in the Valley. Firstly he wants the victims of his government’s repression and oppression to bail him out by defusing the current volatile situation and then sit with him to discuss non-issues. Nobody is going to be taken in by such offers. When the atmosphere in the state was calm and conducive Omar wasted his time. He behaved with arrogance; ignoring his own party rank and file, ignoring mainstream opposition and going after the separatist leaders and their followers. At no point did he show any sign of appetite for dialogue. His immaturity made him believe into his fantasies until he found himself, his government, his own party and the entire mainstream spectrum pushed into a corner. Where on earth is there any scope for a purposeful dialogue after all this destructive work done by the coalition government under his leadership? Omar’s message from New Delhi lacks conviction as well as credibility. It is destined to be lost as a cry in wilderness. Certainly, there must be a better way of going about it than couching the language of peace in arrogant jingoism on the strength of the state’s armed might.

By the courtsey of Kashmir times

Undisputed Tragedy of Kashmir

Several Pakistani intellectuals who had descended on Washington DC to attend 11th International Kashmir Peace Conference (July 28-29, 2010) were neither intellectuals nor interested in peace.
Wasting time and resources, Pakistani representatives (with very few exceptions) read from a script crafted decades ago at the GHQ – slightly changing words.
I bet if you took the text of their speeches and ran it through sophisticated software to check intellectual integrity you will find an abundance of plagiarisms.
Negativity of approach was so overwhelming that ‘Kashmir issue’ lost more currency instead of gaining ground. With WikiLeaks dominating the mind share, American media barely covered the event.
In discussions, both private and public, Pakistani speakers demanded that America must broker a settlement in exchange for the ‘sacrifices’ Pakistan has made in war against terror. All accused America of betraying Pakistan, an ally of nearly 60 years. “Under Bush administration, the neo-cons have steered US towards India and away from Pakistan,” a Pakistani intellectual claimed. And, he explained that is “because Jewish-Hindu lobby dominates policy making in Washington.”

In abundance was child like envy over growing India-US ties, and old and tired threats that if Kashmir issue is not resolved there will be no peace in either Afghanistan or India. Unfortunately, many who “spoke for” Kashmir lacked intellectual depth, and understanding of imperatives that drive strategic diplomatic ties.

All agree that last decade has been a truly transformational one in the India- U.S ties but cannot explain why. In November last year when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh came to Washington on the first State visit of the new U.S. Administration, it was a clear indication that Democrats on the Hill will continue to see India through the prism it first located during the BJP government. India’s proverbial ‘openness’ has yielded rich dividends in terms of cooperation in many areas, underscoring the vitality and the relevance of India-US strategic partnership.

It was therefore, not surprising when Obama administration recalibrated her earlier stance of bracketing “Afghanistan, India, and Pakistan” together. Afghanistan and Pakistan are ‘pain points’ but Washington sees India as a center of influence in the 21st century.

A Pakistani diplomat had whispered in my ears that Americans realize that they cannot “clean the mess in Afghanistan without our help. And of course we want a solution to Kashmir issue in return.”

A friend who also spoke at the conference claimed that Washington is finally realizing that India and Pakistan are equally important in that region. I beg to differ!

I would urge you to look at the transformation of DC-Delhi relationship against the backdrop of India’s initiatives to reform its economy and the geopolitical changes in the post-Cold War world.

Indian officials would claim that their ties with US are primarily due to shared values of democracy, pluralism, tolerance, and respect for fundamental freedoms. You may not agree with this assertion – I don’t buy this argument in entirety either.

But we can’t deny that growing economic linkages and people-to- people contact between India and US are real. Over the last two decades, Indian and American businesses have formed strong and mutually beneficial partnerships touching the lives of ordinary people; a fairly balanced trade in goods and services has grown astronomically.

Most importantly, Pakistanis tend to forget that both Indians and Americans share an increasing convergence of interests on major global issues.

By using the 11th Kashmir moot in Washington DC as a venting session, Pakistanis basically lost an opportunity to build the zone of trust. Kashmir issue is real, and solution will emerge only when Pakistan and India stop exploiting the people of Kashmir. It has become a financial drain for India and Pakistani strategy to use rag-tag army of fundamentalists has cost Pakistan in orders of magnitude more than anyone every estimated.

There is a broad-based political support both in India and Pakistan to finally let the people of Kashmir speak for themselves but these pseudo intellectuals who had come to attend the conference are not ready to move on.

Instead of allowing the GHQ to drive India-centric foreign policy, we will do Pakistan and Kashmir more justice if we were to expand our diplomatic orbit. If we establish mutually beneficial economic ties with Brazil and Venezuela, South Africa and Kenya, Chile and Bolivia, Malaysia and Indonesia – Pakistan will have more allies in the world and we will not have to run to Washington DC to beg Americans for stewardship on Kashmir issue.

India today has free pass to commit unthinkable violence on Kashmiri people partially because we have lost all legitimacy. How can we raise our voices and wave our fists when it is an undisputed fact that Pakistan army used rag-tag warriors of Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Jaish-e- Mohammed, the Taliban, and more with intent to make India bleed in Kashmir? What moral grounds do we stand on?

We can’t be running to the US or Israel for support – we must build a broad based multi-lateral framework of developing nations to counter Indian belligerence in Kashmir. We must stop thinking about Kashmir as a ‘disputed territory’ and start working for the safety and security – both physical and financial of the people of Kashmir.

No cause can justify terrorism – Kashmir is no exception. Both India and Pakistan have a vital interest in defeating terrorism and in this context, our bilateral cooperation on terrorism is crucial.
Most importantly- both India and Pakistan should immediately cease terrorizing Kashmiri people.


Letter to Ban Ki-Moon
By M. Hashim Qureshi

His Excellency Mr. Ban Ki-Moon
Secretary-General United Nations
New York, NY 10017
United States of America 

Esteemed Sir,

I would like to draw your attention to the turbulent situation in Jammu & Kashmir. In reaction to unprovoked killings by Indian Security forces, the people in Kashmir, especially the youth have been staging demonstrations and protests for the past two months. During these peaceful demonstrations, the Indian Security forces have not abstained from using bullets to assassinate people's democratic rights. This has resulted in the fact that during the ongoing agitation part of the youth has been compelled to display their dissatisfaction and anger by stone pelting. But in response to their stone pelting the Indian Security forces have used bullets, which has resulted in the death of more than 30 people, including women and children. The use of extensive and disproportional force by the Indian Security forces has fueled the anger among the people and this turbulent situation seems to have become a vicious circle which will only result in more innocent deaths. 

The use of force by security forces has not been limited to demonstrations, but they even entered homes and embarked on ruthless rampages, which only deteriorates the situation. Zahid Farooq (17 years), Tufail Mattoo (17 years) and Inayat Khan (16 years) were not part of any demonstration or agitation, but were either playing cricket or on their way attending tuition, but they were killed ruthlessly by tear gas shells and bullets fired upon them by Indian Security forces, without any reason or provocation whatsoever. The brain of one of these kids was blown out by a tear gas canister.  

Even during these atrocities, I am proud to state that my Kashmiri people defied communalism and portrayed honesty and Kashmiriyat as they welcomed this year's Hindu pilgrimage and made sure that none of the pilgrims were hurt or refrained from performing their religious duties. On the other hand the Indian Security forces have forbidden the Kashmiri people from performing their religious duties, as the doors of the largest Mosque in Kashmir have remained closed for the last month amidst curfew.   

A 24-hour curfew has been imposed by the Government which has made life come to a standstill. Educational institutions, businesses and hospitals have remained closed for over a month now. Patients are deprived from medical attention. People are frustrated as they have been confined to their homes and scarcity of essential needs has been prevailing. Corruption has been flourishing, because innocent youth is being arrested and extorted for money and otherwise charge sheeted with serious crimes.  

Even local Ministers have said that the Indian Security forces are out of their control. The Indian establishment and intellectual class, including the Indian Prime Minister, Indian President, Indian Home Minister and Indian media have been silent over these atrocities and numb to people's cries for justice. Local Kashmiri media has been banned and local journalists are assailed. The justice system has collapsed as the courts have clearly been degraded to toothless tigers. 

Thousands of detainees are cleared by courts of charges, but as soon as they are released, they are again arrested by the police and detained under draconian laws like Public Safety Act (PSA) and Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA). These laws have their roots in the Defence of India Act (DIA) which was enacted during the British rule. PSA is actually a more rigorous form of the DIA that was described, as a draconian and a black law enacted by Britishers to suppress Indian freedom struggle, by the founding father of Indian democracy Mahatma Ghandi.  

My people are treated like colonial slaves and expropriated of their freedom and inalienable rights. As your Excellency is the safeguard and trustee of Human Rights and Liberty, I, on behalf of the enslaved Kashmiri nation, humbly request your Excellency to take note of the grave human rights violations in Kashmir and address the reign of state terrorism unleashed upon us. If addressed, the below mentioned points could prove to be a foundation in resolving the decades old Kashmir issue:  

1) Revocation of draconian laws like AFSPA and PSA.

2) Demilitarization of Jammu & Kashmir and removal of bunkers and military establishments.

3) Release of all political prisoners.

4) Clarity on disappearances and creation of an enquiry and monitoring system into these disappearances under the supervision of the UN.

5) Rehabilitation and opportunity of pursuit of happiness for all those who have abandoned Violence.

6) Rehabilitation and creation of a mechanism to bring back all Kashmiris who left their motherland during the 20-years of violence, including Kashmiri Pandits.  

Dear Excellency, the above mentioned points are not a solution to the Kashmir problem, but they could provide the Kashmiri people a breeze of peace and prove to be essential in creating an atmosphere and fundament among the concerned parties, in order to make way for a lasting solution to this issue. Your Excellency, the people of Kashmir have been suffering for more than half of a century and are in desperate need of justice and rejuvenation of their self-esteem.

Your Excellency, I hope that you will bring your personal influence to bear to initiate a peace process, which will include the people of Jammu & Kashmir, in order to reach a peaceful settlement which will be based on the incontestable principles of justice.

With kind regards, 

M. Hashim Qureshi

Chairman JK Democratic Liberation Party.

Social United Forum Bagh AJK
“Act 1974- A Document of slavery-Incomplete Freedom”
Bagh AJK
The Proposed changes in the Interim Constitution Act 1974 AJK
The Social United Forum Bagh (SUFB) AJK is a Political, Social and intellectual Forum working for the reunification and independence of Jammu Kashmir as a Democratic, Secular and Progressive state, for the being multi-religious state, It is only possible and suitable way to run it as a state and Maintain its consolidation and independence,too.The other assignment which SUFB has taken upon itself is to think, plan and highlight the requirements of district Bagh, neglected by the political leadership and the government, to bring it at par with other districts of Pakistan-Administered –Jammu Kashmir(PAJK).
However, despite its claim of being political, Social and intellectual platform, its main function would remain intellectual and educative and would work through conferences, seminars and workshops etc.Instead pf public meetings processions and protest as the custom the territory and around.
The today’s seminar “Act-1974 a Document of Slavery-Incomplete Freedom” is in the line of our mission. We want to purge it of all symbols, signs and sections, which render this state as a colony. For that, side by side with suggesting amendments in the particular sections, we are also going to suggest changes in the main features of this Act. In fact, we like to improve it from an act to Constuition, which needs a constituent assembly and we have already demanded that. But needs a long and different type of struggle, which continue. In the meantime, we are raising our voice with the voice of Prime Minister of PAJK, who has been harping on amending this Act. We know that he has dramatized the situation unnecessarily, for he can change most of sections just in the joint sitting with simple Majority, which he can muster with the help of his own party.
Any way, we want to be helpful to him, at least politically, by highlighting the required changes. Firstly, we would like to change this act into a Constitution by electing a new constituent assembly meant for this purpose. Secondly, if the puppets of PAJK want to remain always under heavy hand of master, they should say so clearly and unambiguously and give Pakistan only three (3) subjects, the maximum defence, Foreign affairs and currency till the final resolution of Jammu Kashmir dispute.

But in the case, too there should be a deputy defense minister and deputy foreign Minister from PAJK to watch the interest of the state. The Pakistan shall have keep her hand off from all other subjects –Health Education, trade, culture etc, for all shall be dealt with by the PAJK govt according to its own constitution, which it is yet to frame. There won’t be a Kashmir Council, Lent officers, Military commanders to supervise our Government. And agencies to make and break Govts. We would like to purge our state of all block-headed, inefficient, incompetent and corrupt hierarchy, which has damaged and destroyed their country to the point of no return. We wish that we should be allowed to run our affairs at our own without dictation from outside and without forcing us to go for the last option. But, at present in this seminar we are going a changes in few sections of the   Act-1974 in bit moderate way. Which are the following:-

  1. The last bit one paragraph of the ‘preface’ (page-iii) should finish at …….

17th June, 1985.’No need to mention 2 names of those who are known as the institutions of Loot and plunder in such a basic document of a nation.

  1. Section-2(3): should be omitted. It is not the business of a state to interfere in citizen’s faith which is concerned with hereafter.

  1. Section 3: should also be omitted. It is ridiculous to ascribe a faith to a lifeless body like a state. The religion is me3ant for the people not for the States.

  1. Section-5 (President)-(4)(a): should be omitted. In 100 percent Muslim Population no person other than Muslim can claim to become a President. Then why this unnecessary addition just to invite criticism.

  1. section -7(2): should be omitted. It is absolutely irrelevant and idiotic to demand implementation of UNO’s resolutions, which give freedom to the people of Jammu Kashmir to vote either for Pakistan or for India .you Have no right to restrict it to Pakistan alone; and still claim to be champions of democracy.

  1. Section-10: Proviso should be omitted. It amounts to snatch away the freedom religion from the citizen of the territory.

  1. Section-13(2): should also be omitted as in case of President

  1. Section -15 to Justify this section you need to repeal all the discriminatory laws on the basis of faith an political ideas.

  1. Section -17: The words ‘Most senior Minister’ should be properly defined such as age service or any other qualification etc.

  1. Section-19(2): The Act-1974 should be purged of all the Bindings on the Govt of PAJK except in 3 subjects-defense foreign affairs and currency and that too till the final resolution of Jammu Kashmir dispute. This govt should not be bound by the dictation of the Council, which is not an institution of Jammu Kashmir for it is headed by a non state-subject Prime Minister of Pakistan, who can not become a member of Jammu Kashmir Assembly.

  1. Section-21: there should be no institution like Council which is not headed by a state-subject of Jammu Kashmir. There should be an upper-House- senate at Muxaffarabad.

  1. Section-22: Legislative Assembly should be superior institution with all the powers of assemblies in parliamentary system and should be subservient to any other institution like Kashmir council. At present its scope is too limited to be called a legislative assembly.

  1. Section-30: The quorum should be fixed at 50 percent of the total membership, while the decision should be made with 2/3 majority of total members, so that such decision could reflect the reasonable majority of the voters.

  1. Section-32: There should be no Council of Islamic Ideology and the powers should be vested in the Legislative Assembly which could consult any religious scholars if need be for it would reduce a lot of Burden on the public exchequer.

  1. Section-33: the proviso of this section should be omitted and Legislative Assembly should have unlimited powers to amend this Act.

  1. Section-34 the Kashmir Council should be brought within the Jurisdiction of higher courts of PAJK.

  1. Section-35: the Bill passed by the council should also require the assent of the president.

  1. Section-42: the Judges of supreme Court of PAJK should be appointed by a panel of Legislative Assembly with the consultation of chief Justice of Supreme and the President. In case. it is Chief Justice’s appointment., both prime Minister and president should be consulted, But council should have nothing to do it.

  1. Section-42-E: If at any time and at any occasion the Supreme Judicial Council seems partial; the president should have power to replace it to the extent of partiality.

  1. Section-43: The Judges of High Court should also be appointed by panel of Legislative Assembly with the consultation of Chief Justice of Supreme Court and High Court and the president. In case of appointment of Chief Justice, with the consultation of Chief Justice of Supreme Court and the President. Again council should have nothing to do it.

  1. Section-44-A: to make a clear-cut move to separate judiciary from the executive courts should have powers to make rules for the courts of all levels without consultation of govt.

  1. Section-46-A: The decisions of Supreme Court of PAJK should not just be advisory, but binding on the council and its chairman as Kashmir Council and chairman of Kashmir Council; otherwise how a non state-subject can be a ruler of Jammu Kashmir? Then what was wrong with Maharajah Hari Singh who was also a state-subject.

  1. Section-56: The responsibility of Pakistan according to UNCIP;s direction, id to supervise the separated part of Jammu Kashmir till its final resolution and not to dictate and integrate this territory into Pakistan; which she has doing for the last 60 years. Therefore, this section should be omitted and Pakistan should be given only three subjects as has been mentioned in the preceding lines with some conditions.

  1. Section-57(2): Courts should have powers to direct the govt. regarding fundamental Human rights and protection of Parliamentary structure.

  1. Section-58: If the President is authorized to make such rules, He should be directly elected president, and not otherwise.

  1. Schedules Regarding Oath: the incumbent of any office should take oath in the name of God, But it is a absolutely ridiculous to recite all the details of one’s faith. Hence these should be omitted; I that the basic document of the state become unburdened of irrelevant and unnecessary details.

Note: We have not discussed the details of Subjects assigned to the Legislative Assembly and Kashmir Council respectively’beacuase all powers at present we know are vested with Kashmir Council while Legislative Assembly is very poorly equipped with the law making powers, especially relating to the finance. Hence we have recommended Kashmir Council’ abolition, and a senate in its place>no more or Less.

Issued By:  Raja Habib-ur- Rehman Prepared by:

Secretary General SUFB Social United forum Bagh AJK (SUFB)

Kashmir is our "Core Concern"
Islamabad needs to worry about Kabul, while New Delhi should address Kashmiri demands
SM KRISHNA has shown a courage and sagacity that is rare in Indian politics. Not only has he refused to be drawn into a slanging match with Shah Mehmood Qureshi, but he has done what no political leader has done, to my knowledge, in recent years — take on the powerful Indian bureaucracy in public and put the blame for the failure of the talks on the timing of Home Secretary GK Pillai’s revelation of the ISI’s hand in the 26/11 attacks on Mumbai.
By accepting a large part of the blame, Krishna has reopened the way for the resumption of talks between the two nations. But what can they talk about now? Coming on top of Ajmal Kasab’s confession, and David Headley’s admissions to the FBI, and to India’s NIA, the evidence of continuing ISI complicity with the Taliban has ripped the veil of ambivalence off the face of the Pakistan state. They show that even under Pervez Musharraf the Pakistan army never stopped, and never intended to stop, using terrorism against India.
The sharp resurgence of separatist sentiment in Kashmir has also blighted the prospect of peace talks between the two countries. It has made it next to impossible for any civilian government in Islamabad to pick up the threads of the Manmohan–Musharraf backchannel negotiations from where they were dropped in 2007. The premise on which these were being held was Musharraf’s realisation that while Kashmiris wanted azadi, they did not want to become a part of Pakistan. This made it possible for both nations to look for a formula that met the substance of Kashmiri demands without any formal change of borders. Today, the rising tide of anger in Kashmir has swept the moderates away. Therefore, it has become extremely difficult for any Pakistani government to explain to its own people why it is still prepared to discuss issues such as the quantum of autonomy, and inter-Kashmir co-ordination of policies, when so many Kashmiris are willing to die rather than stay in the Indian union on any terms.
Must we remain content with talking about talks till the Americans and NATO start pulling out of Afghanistan, Pakistan faces the full backlash of the Taliban and Al Qaeda’s victory, and tries to save itself by redirecting attention to Kashmir?
The answer is that the path to peace is still not entirely blocked, but it will require both countries to abandon the composite dialogue and address each others’ core concerns straightaway. This requires honest rethinking because Pakistan’s core concern is not Kashmir but its undemarcated and unaccepted border with Afghanistan. No Afghan government has ever accepted the Durand Line. Thus Pakistan’s central concern, especially after the secession of Bangladesh is the stabilisiation of its western border. To do this, it has felt it necessary to have a government in Kabul over which it has a measure of control. This is what fuels its paranoid allergy to India’s current influence in Afghanistan.
Kashmir is India’s, not Pakistan’s core concern. It is the only Muslim majority part of the country. In 1947, its dominant political party, the National Conference, chose not to join Pakistan because it felt that Kashmiris had a better chance of preserving their composite culture within a federal, democratic India. But India has not been able to live up to its promise because Pakistan has not allowed New Delhi to ever fully relax its hold on Kashmir. The one thing that Delhi is able to afford less and less with every passing year is a communal backlash on Muslims in India because of what might happen in Kashmir.
Peace and stability in South Asia will only come when the two countries understand and respect each other’s core concerns, and agree to address them jointly. The time for doing this is running out.


UK PNP Condemns such acts
Brussels: The United Kashmir People's National Party (UKPNP), has strongly reacted on this news and called upon world community to come forward to save Kashmiri people and specially the young school going girls which are vulnerable and at the target of the personnels of secret agencies of Pakistan freely and independently and with dominant
authority residing in the Pakistani Occupied Kashmir. Issuing a statement from Party's International secretariat Party president M. Ishaq Khan, General Secretary Jamil Maqsood, Vice president Sikandar Abbas, Yasir Younas, Raja Shahid Iqbal, Sajid Hussain and others have strongly condemned the action of pakistani secret agents. They said that few years back a Dragger Group ( Churra Group), was wandering in the area and they have brutely killed hundred of people, finally they were caught by the people in Rawalakot and when police arrested them they were revealed their identification as members of notorious Pakistani spy agency ISI. They were taken by the military and there was no trail against those killers of Pakistani military. Party's Belgium branch has asked fellow Party units in various countries to take notice of such terrifying acts and forward it to the Human rights organizations, Members of the local and European Parliament so that world community and international leaders could pressurise Pakistan and its notorious agencies to stop harassment of our people in Pakistani Occupied Kashmir.


US Congressmen Call For Resolution of Kashmir
Washington 29 July 2010:  The underway youth led, indigenous and spontaneous movement, non-violent pluralistic and resilient youth   for right to self-determination in Jammu and Kashmir is at a critical juncture calls upon the United Nations to ‘lead the effort to achieve a fair and lasting settlement of the Kashmir dispute’, were the opening remarks of Dr. Ghulam Nabi at the inaugural session of the two day Eleventh International Kashmir Peace Conference organizaied by the Kashmiri American Council/ Kashmir Centre and Association of Humanitarian Lawyers in Washington wall.
The conference held in glittering hall of the Cannon Building  in the Capitol Hill was attended by  large number of delegates from India, Pakistan, both the sides of Jammu and Kashmir, Kashmir Diaspora from all over the world, United State’s thinks, Congressmen,  diplomats from various countries stationed in Washington D.C., prominent US columnists and opinion makers.
Congress men who spoke at the inaugural function included Congressman Dan Burton, Congressman  Alderholt, Cingressman Danny Davis, Congressman, Dannis Kuchinich, Congressman Yvette Clark and Congressman Joseph Pit. The Congressmen expressing their deep concern and dissatisfaction over the situation prevailing in trouble torn Jammu and Kashmir called upon ending the persecution of people in the state and respecting human rights in the state. They called upon India and Pakistan to resolve the Kashmir dispute to the urges and political aspirations of people of Jammu and Kashmir without causing any further suffering to people in the state. The Congressmen were unanimous in their approach that for bringing peace in South Asia the resolution of Kashmir dispute has become imperative. Some of the Congressmen said the President Obama was fully aware about the importance of Jammu and Kashmir for peace and stability not only in Afghanistan but for entire south Asia.
Highlighting the objectives for the Conference Dr. Fai, was to achieve the peaceful resolution of the Kashmir dispute through peaceful dialogue between all parties concerned and to do so  in the spirit of reconciliation, not confrontation, equality, not discrimination; hope, not despair.
Mr. Hussein Haqani, Ambassador Huessin Haqani Ambassador of Pakistan speaking on the occasion reaffirmed the policy of Pakistan government of supporting Kashmir struggle for right to self-determination, morally, politically and diplomatically. Others who spoke at the inaugural and emphasized for renewing efforts at all levels for finding solution of the Kashmir problem in sync with the internationally laid out principles included Ms. Victoria Schofield, Mrs. Rita Manchandi, Mr. Ved Bhasi and Amb: Maleeh Lodhi.
The first technical session of the conference India- Pakistan Relations: Breaking Deadlock was presided over by Author and Columnists Zahid G Muhammad, those who made their presentations in this session included Mr. Kuldin Nayar, Former Indian High Commissioner, in the UK, Mr. Muhammad Afzal Sindhu, State Minister, Law and Justice Govt of Pakistan, Prof. Stanely Wolpert, Historan, Senator Mushahid Hussain Syed and Ambassador Yousuf Buch.
The consensus that evolved at this session was that the people of Kashmir suffering for India and Pakistan remaining caught in the web of the blame game and there was need for moving beyond the blame game and resumption of composite dialogue between two countries and holding Kashmir focused dialogue involving people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The second Techencial Session titled The Impasse over Kashmir  was presided by Mr. Ejaz Sabir, Attorney at Law. Those who made their presentations in this session included Dr. Karen Parker, UN Delegate, Intl.Ed. Development, Dr. Attiya Inaytullah, Member Pakistan National Assembly, Zahid G Muhammad. Author and Writer, Prof. Angana Chateerji and Dr. M.A. Dar, Ohio
The Time Correspondent who was recently in Srinagar exhibited a small documentary on recent developments on Kashmir during the session.
The third session on Kashmir Issue: Its impact on Regional and International Security was Presided over by Barristor Sareer Fazili Esq. Those who made their presentation at this session included Amb: Munir Akram, Former Ambassador of Pakistan to UN. Justice Rajinder Sachar, Dr. Rodeny Jones, M. Ahmed Bilal Sufi Presideny Ressearch Society.

Copyright © 2008 Voice of Vienna. Powered by Sterling IT Services

Visit Kashmir At www.MyKashmir.in